The CT Constitutional Convention

The Issue of Question 1 on the CT Ballot in 2008

© Lisa Hugick

Oct 28, 2008
About a month before the election, the issue of Question 1 has been hotly debated. Why is this so and what is at stake?

In 2008, voters in Connecticut will get to decide if a Constitutional Convention will be held to change the state Constitution. Proponents and opponents have been campaigning to sway voters to their sides. There are many issues at stake this year, so it is important for Connecticut voters to be informed in order to make the best possible decision when it comes to Question 1.

History

Connecticut led the way in constitutional government in 1639 by putting into place the Fundamental Orders, the first form of constitutional government in the colonies. This is why the state is nicknamed the Constitution State. After 1776, the State of Connecticut did not have a written constitution but continued to operate as it had under the Fundamental Orders. Since the government was stable and the Federalists had little to no opposition from the Republicans, there was no need to rewrite the Constitution. In 1818, however, there was conflict between the Republicans and Federalists and a convention was called in order to put a constitution writing and practice. In 1902, there was an attempt at changing this constitution since it did not address the representation of the lower house of the General Assembly. However, a convention did not take place until 1965. The 1965 constitution is the current constitution of Connecticut. A provision was put in place allowing the voters to decide every twenty years if a constitutional convention was to be held. In 1986, the voters voted "no". In 2008, the question is on the ballot again. (Information taken from Connecticut Constitutional History by Henry S. Cohn)

Process of Conventions

Advertisements by the opponents to the convention state that special interest groups would be in charge of the convention and would destroy all rights that have won. In actuality, the convention would allow for referendums for petitioners to put forth new measures. The General Assembly would set the criteria for who is a member of the convention. For all proposals, a majority vote would have to be obtained from the general public voters before any change to the constitution would be allowed to take place. (Connecticut State Constitution, Article 13) On September 26, 2008, current Governor Jodi Rell magazine showed her support for a constitutional convention in Newsday magazine stating that public participation in government allows the public to be better served by the government.

Hot Issue

Before the legalization of gay marriage in the state on October 10, 2008, there was little or no talk about Question 1. After the Connecticut Supreme Court's decision, many opponents of gay marriage started encouraging voters to vote yes on Question 1 in hopes of adding an amendment to the constitution stating that marriage is between one woman and one man. In response to these grassroot efforts, gay marriage supporters and others opposed to the constitutional convention put out television ads stating that the conventions would be dominated by special interests, especially those who wanted to take away rights such as gay marriage and on demand abortion. Since then, Question 1 has started to grab more attention.

Other Issues

While gay marriage is what made the topic so prominent about a month before the elections, there are other issues at stake. The state legislature has not passed a law requiring parents of teenage daughters to be notified when the teenager gets an abortion, which both opponents and supporters of abortion would like to see. In summer of 2007, William Petit's Cheshire home was invaded and his wife and two daughters were killed. After this attack, Petit worked tirelessly to get the legislature to pass a Three Strikes Bill, which ended up failing. The Three Strikes Bill would require life sentences for repeat offenders of violent crimes, including but not limited to rape, murder, arson, assault and kidnapping. Other issues at stake would be property tax reform (including lowering taxes) and imposing term limits on public officials.

"Vote No on Question 1"

Some of the groups who are opposed to the Constitutional Convention are Liberals Like Christ, NARAL Pro-Choice Connecticut, Planned Parenthood of Connecticut, Queers Without Borders and teacher's unions. For a more complete list, visit the Diocese of Bridgeport website (the list is at the bottom of the page).

"Vote Yes on Question 1"

There are fewer organizations that are supporting the Constitutional Convention, but they are not allowing their voices to be silenced. These groups are the Catholic Bishops of Connecticut, the Connecticut Catholic Conference and the Family Institute of Connecticut.

Final Consideration

The government is elected to serve the people. Before going into the voting booths on November 4th, take a look at what is at stake. Make sure that the state government is representing you. If they are not, take hold of this opportunity to get your voice heard.


The copyright of the article The CT Constitutional Convention in US Elections is owned by Lisa Hugick. Permission to republish The CT Constitutional Convention in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.




Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Oct 30, 2008 6:18 AM
Guest :
You have the wrong website for Vote No. That's a Vote Yes website. Is that intentional?
Nov 1, 2008 1:54 PM
Guest :
Actually it is correct- while the link does lead to a "vote yes" website, there is a list of groups opposed to question #1 at the bottom of the page, as described above. I agree it is a bit misleading but the list of "vote no" groups is indeed there.
Nov 3, 2008 6:46 AM
Guest :
To answer the previous comment: even though its a "Yes"-supporting website, it does list the "No" supporting organizations at the bottom.
Nov 3, 2008 7:23 AM
Guest :
why do we always think the negative when a mistake is made
relax, were human
Nov 3, 2008 7:57 AM
Guest :
The article says that the website that is posted has a list of all the organizations that oppose the constitutional convention. It doesn't say that the website is a "Vote No" website.
Nov 3, 2008 10:45 AM
Guest :
Perhaps a better place to look to find a list of group opposed to the Convention is not the Diocese of Bridgeport website but, rather (and more obviously) the CT Vote No website: http://www.ctvoteno.org
Nov 3, 2008 4:30 PM
Guest :
the article only states there is a more complete list of Vote No organizations on the Diocese of Bridgeport website
Nov 3, 2008 4:37 PM
Guest :
What I think the author was saying it that you can look at the bottom of that site and see the list of all the opposing organizations and you can.
Nov 3, 2008 5:25 PM
Guest :
This is what I was looking for. An explaination of question 1.
Why do you care if the links take you to the yes or no site?
You people seem to be missing the point of this article.
Nov 3, 2008 7:45 PM
Guest :
I think the liberal organizations are worried that if these important moral issues are given directly to the people to vote on & not left in the hands of our "representatives" because they don't really represent the majority; things may change for them- let's see what the MAJORITY of actual CT voters want...LETS KEEP MORALITY A PRIORITY & NOT MONEY when you vote TOMORROW!!God Bless
Nov 4, 2008 5:18 AM
Guest :
JUST VOTE NO,NO, NO, NO!!!! OTHERWISE WE WILL LOSE OUR RIGHT TO BE ABLE TO INTERVENE IN ANYTHING AND HAVE OUR VOICES HEARD!!! OUR CHILDREN IN SCHOOL WILL SUFFER. OUR POLICE AND FIRE STATIONS WILL NOT BE AS GOOD BECAUSE THEY WILL HAVE TO LAY SOME OF THEM OFF, WHICH MEANS THAT OUR LIVES WILL BE IN MORE DANGER! OUR RIGHT TO MAKE ANY DECISIONS FOR OURSELVES WILL BE CUT AT THE THROAT! PEOPLE ARE HAVING A HARD ENOUGH TIME FINDING JOBS NOW...... DO WE REALLY NEED TO MAKE THAT EVEN WORSE? COME ON PEOPLE!!! W A K E U P!!!!! J U S T V O T E N O!!!!
Nov 4, 2008 3:23 PM
Guest :
How were voters notified about Question One? I was not aware of it until yesterday when I saw a pro commercial and then my neighbor mentioned it. I got sick of election coverage and took a break from the news...oops, guess that was a bad idea. But still, I would expect there to be a statewide notification. My town always sends us something with the exact wording when they have something up for vote; doesn't the state??? Neither my husband nor I received a thing.
Nov 11, 2008 3:31 PM
Guest :
I'd like to know where people get their ideas from. If everyone did a little research or listened to talk radio where we can be informed of the reality of issues instead of listening to the religious extremists, everyone would have known to vote NO to question #1. The reality is that the government is indeed dominated by the "special interest groups," and allowing them to change the Constitution to suit their interests would be incredibly detrimental to what we have left of our freedom.
Nov 12, 2008 9:38 PM
Guest :
The wording to question one was very vague, voter notification comes every year in the mail, except this year, I was not aware of it until I showed up to vote and it was meant to confuse. If they want a vote on gay marriage, come out and be direct, yes or no to a specific topic, as far as I'm concerned connecticut voters had no say on the issue of gay marriage and the issue of the constitutional convention.
14 Comments